Supreme Court Questioned Why Mahama Cannot Interrogate The EC Chair

0
189
The Ghana national flag, center, flies in front of the Supreme Court building in the city of Accra, Ghana, Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2015. Ghana's judicial service says seven high court judges have been suspended following corruption allegations by a journalist. In a statement released Monday, the Judicial Council said the decision was made following the judges' "stated misbehavior." (AP Photo/Christian Thompson)

A member of the legal team of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Baba Jamal, has given accounts how the Supreme Court (SC) in 2012/13 election petition granted an interlocutory application to a petitioner then-presidential candidate of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) Nana Akufo-Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo who lost an election in 2012.

“In 2013, the court granted to Nana Addo the opportunity for interrogatories. The court explained that once it can help with the quickening of the case, they will allow it. At that time the justices were nine.

This time the justices are seven but they still disagreed with us”, Baba Jamal who is a spokesperson for the John Mahama legal team in the ongoing election petition recollected.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed interrogatories request by the National Democratic Congress (NDC) flagbearer, John Mahama asking the Electoral Commission to answer some legal questions to clarify matters of fact and help to determine in advance what facts will be presented in the 2020 election petition trial.

However, the court dismissed the motion as it stated that “relevance of interlocutory by the petitioner has not been established”.

“So what was accepted in 2013, is now being quashed today. With the new law, the court wants to expedite the process, and we believe that this could have fastened the process”, Baba Jamal told Sefa Danquah on the ‘Epa Hoa Daben’ show monitored by MyNewsGh

Background

The facts relate to Jean Mensa’s declaration of election polls results on December 9.

Some of the questions Mahama’s lawyers were seeking the EC to answer were;

  1. Whether NCA facilitated the transmission of results to the EC Headquarters.
  2. Practice in a previous presidential election involving the collation figures
  3. Was this practice followed?
  4. How were results transferred from constituency collation centers to regional collation centers?
  5. If the December 7 election was the first time EC introduced regional collation centers as an intermediary between constituency collation centers and EC head
  6. How did the EC and returning officer retaliate there say errors in the declaration?
  7. When did Mrs. Jean Mensa realize there were errors in the December 9 declaration?
  8. Did the EC confer with agents before making the purported correction?
  9. Did EC give FORM 13 to all the agents of the presidential candidates?

Source: KnustNews

WHATSAPP ALERT

Send your stories/articles to info@ghnewspress.com or via WhatsApp on +233264317658/+233239200197 Get daily job alert on WhatsApp by joining our group

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here